I think this is a very important cultural step to do. We believe that the first people to do something should be valued the highest. But taking out all the other people who come afterwards they also might not have succeeded. Therefore it's really an open argument who should be valued how much for his participation.

I also really like the idea of that, even as Founder number 1. Having a healthy, fair and equal relationship to many capable people might also be worth more to founders than another million bucks.