It sounds like it's written from the vantage point of an incoming turnaround/bailout team, which explains the shifting perspectives. It's not quite existing management, but a wanna-be new team that shifts into speaking on behalf of the envisioned future incarnation.
Still, I agree there's a high probability it's a hoax.
Re-launch April 1?
No discussion whatsoever of criminal liabilities?
Tallying seized funds in others' hands (including CoinLab and USGov), pending legal cases, as assets?
Totally fanciful belief there'd be donations and new buyers/investors ("cash injections to buy coins [that by the way actually don't exist] at the cheap MtGox price") through a 1-month shutdown-restart, where the only asset is Gox's brand?
It's hallucinatory, to whatever extent it's not an intentional parody of other 'too big to fail' bailouts.
Still, I agree there's a high probability it's a hoax.
Re-launch April 1?
No discussion whatsoever of criminal liabilities?
Tallying seized funds in others' hands (including CoinLab and USGov), pending legal cases, as assets?
Totally fanciful belief there'd be donations and new buyers/investors ("cash injections to buy coins [that by the way actually don't exist] at the cheap MtGox price") through a 1-month shutdown-restart, where the only asset is Gox's brand?
It's hallucinatory, to whatever extent it's not an intentional parody of other 'too big to fail' bailouts.