This maybe different. Unlike your own personal notes, your lawyers notes and records cannot be subpoenaed. But... the TOS from Claude might be a backdoor. So this is maybe an untested situation (as far as I know). The judge could decide the info is privileged because its an extension of the lawyers note-taking and research OR the judge could say its not privileged because the info was shared with Anthropic as a third party. Anybody know if this has happened yet?