Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
jghn
4 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Functional programming and reliability: ADTs, safe...
No I think your point is good, it just wasn't contradictory and I think that was your intent. Defining FP is a dark art :)
agumonkey
4 months ago
[–]
maybe FP should be explained as `rules not values`. in scheme it's common to negate the function to be applied, or curry some expression or partially compose / thread rules/logic to get a potential future value that did nothing yet
jghn
4 months ago
|
parent
[–]
I like it. I think I said this in a separate post in here but I've taken to breaking it down to different archetypes and discussing them separately.
Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: