Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No I think your point is good, it just wasn't contradictory and I think that was your intent. Defining FP is a dark art :)


maybe FP should be explained as `rules not values`. in scheme it's common to negate the function to be applied, or curry some expression or partially compose / thread rules/logic to get a potential future value that did nothing yet


I like it. I think I said this in a separate post in here but I've taken to breaking it down to different archetypes and discussing them separately.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: