I'm talking about the case I replied to, where one side explains something, and the other rejects it without reason - that's an absence of communication and collaboration. And no, usually the other party's goal is to reject change that comes from someone other than them, due to ego, arrogance, anxiety, apathy, laziness, etc.
Is it possible that in some cases they're talking in good faith, but using an approach to communicate or collaboration that you misunderstand?