Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think he meant it hasn't undergone the same level of public scrutiny. You've certainly spent ample time researching it, and it's obviously been tested, but possibly not as much something like AES.


OK, but PBKDF2 hasn't had very much scrutiny either. The entire field of key derivation functions has been very much neglected.


bcrypt is better tested than PBKDF2: far more publicly "testable" systems use it (bcrypt was the password file format for OpenBSD).


was?


In the sense of "that's where it came from".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: