> With all respect possible, you generated something that a professional will create for 20 minutes on a napkin (in the context of logo idea).
I feel like I understand where you're coming from, but often the phrase I hear by experts (I even use this myself in my space) is, "Sure, it only took 20 minutes to do this wiring/write this code/draw this logo, but it took 5 years to know what to make." Sure, the results aren't what you'd get if you paid a professional logo designer, but if you can get close enough, it's really cutting out the X years training necessary to get to that point.
>it's really cutting out the X years training necessary to get to that point.
This is exactly my point. With repetition and solid design foundation comes the intuition what is the right direction towards the accomplishing of the given task.
Some will say the design is a subjective, I would argue that designers' role is to move towards objectivity and away from the idea of "personal taste".
That's why I give a link to the works of the master in this craft.
This is exactly the same argument with the Copilot case. Is it capable to give some "boilerplate" solution - yes. Is this solution mediocre at best - yes.
I feel like I understand where you're coming from, but often the phrase I hear by experts (I even use this myself in my space) is, "Sure, it only took 20 minutes to do this wiring/write this code/draw this logo, but it took 5 years to know what to make." Sure, the results aren't what you'd get if you paid a professional logo designer, but if you can get close enough, it's really cutting out the X years training necessary to get to that point.