Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You usually patent the use of such bacteria, not the bacteria per se.


The strain itself (and its specific genome) can be patented. Not as it's found "in the wild", but with genetic modification. The thing is this "genetic modification" includes not just techniques like CRISPR, but also just letting the bacteria mutate in a vat.

I think it's total nonsense, but the law allows it. If wild bacteria growing on your skin happens to mutate into the exact same genetic code as a patented strain, you could technically be in infringement.

[1] https://internationalprobiotics.org/focus-on-probiotic-paten...


Even still, why would such a patent be useful? Couldnt competitors just sell the generic version?


They can and do. But if you pay for a bunch of lab/clinical research with a specific strain you get to say it’s the one that’s actually been tested.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: