Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't know if it's so bad if the press hears about the nuclear batteries. It might distract them from the larger risks involved with launching a satellite. For example, the tank of hydrazine used for the propulsion system. If that springs a leak there is a highly unstable and toxic gas all over your launch site - even after the giant fireball it causes destroys your satellite. Next I would worry about the ready to explode rocket stack beneath the satellite. If that explodes on your town it will hurt many, many more people than the thermoelectric generator that was incinerated in the explosion.


> If that springs a leak there is a highly unstable and toxic gas all over your launch site - even after the giant fireball it causes destroys your satellite.

This actually happened at least once to a Soviet Proton (UR-500) rocket; it was a big factor in the cancellation of the much larger UR-700.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: