Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So it's conditional reality. Now make that fit within your usual realistic philosophy...


Easy. There exist contingency relationships between axioms and theorems provable from those axioms.


Oh, yeas, your proof is quite real. And it's completely meaningless, being all about imaginary things.

It can only have any meaning if you adhere to some scientific model.

At this point you've deviated so much from the OP discussion that you could as well talk about angels dancing in pinheads. Any quantification of them is as real as your proof.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: