Heavy industry and chip manufacturing are not really comparable though. The cutting edge nodes are only relevant for a few years, maybe a decade for rudimentary components.
The major problem the US, and the West, face right now is that its more profitable to speculate on financial and real estate assets than it is to actually produce anything.
In 20201 in Sydney and Vancouver for example, the average house price has increased more per day than the average daily salary for a worker...
The other issue is that the West (particularly the Anglosphere) is intent on importing as many low-cost workers as possible, from countries with poor records of innovation, who then bring their own problems such as caste favoritism and high in-group preferences.
The simplest solution would probably be to import Taiwanese engineers en-masse, and formally create new chipset companies (which are not Intel), which it seems only China is really doing.
A direct policy approach could be for the USA to offer anyone with a university degree or trade skill and under the age of 40, from non-oil countries with a HDI of over .85 the ability to permanently migrate to the USA for a nominal fee:
And at the same time, deporting all illegal immigrants (to free up housing) and building walls along the southern border - the shortage of cheap labour will encourage automation and innovation.
Damn, it started well but you went into some really deep prejudice. I’ll take note that Taiwanese are the best ROI for low cost immigrants - apparently much better than Mexicans.
How about putting some reins on the real estate and trading markets instead of “getting better immigrants”? Sounds a little bit more logical.
What obligation does a country have to non-citizens who entered (and stayed in) the country illegally? FWIW I grew up in San Diego county, less than 20 miles from the border
What obligation do I have to sign on to exclusionary immigration policy. The southern border is just a line in the sand. No party (US or Mexico) has a reasonable claim to the land to begin with.
If a state’s borders aren’t enforced, either those borders are not in fact the state’s real borders, or the people residing within those “borders” are living in a failed state.
This logic isn't remotely sound. It's a ridiculous false dichotomy. There's a third option: It's a normal state that hasn't built walls around it like some kind of medieval walled cities. Do you think every state that isn't completely walled off (there are basically none besides the Vatican) is "failed"?
Who said anything about walls? A state’s borders are defined by the land area over which it upholds its own legal system. If a state’s legal system is unenforceable within its so called “borders”, then by definition those are either no longer its borders, or the people living within the land area over which the state’s legal system cannot be enforced are living in a failed state. The borders will have become disputed in that case.
And as I said before, the southern border is mostly made up. People crossed it for thousands of years without some crappy wall in the way. They will continue to cross it even with a wall.
It’s to keep anyone out who isn’t coming here legally. Mexicans who are going to follow our laws(starting at the border) and will be a net benefit to the US will be welcomed.
I can understand that sentiment in countries where you have a very strong (and expensive) social safety net. It’s funny to hear it from the USA, which is not that, and was built by immigrants…
Do you also deport citizens who are not a “net benefit”? Would be the logical thing to do.
> And at the same time, deporting all illegal immigrants (to free up housing)
These people are responding to demand for cheap labor and trying to better themselves. The real way to address this is severe criminal punishments for their employers.
Finding them requires a level of police state that it's unclear the US will tolerate, even if you promise them it will only be applied to non white people. It would start with mandatory ID and work up from there.
The major problem the US, and the West, face right now is that its more profitable to speculate on financial and real estate assets than it is to actually produce anything.
In 20201 in Sydney and Vancouver for example, the average house price has increased more per day than the average daily salary for a worker...
The other issue is that the West (particularly the Anglosphere) is intent on importing as many low-cost workers as possible, from countries with poor records of innovation, who then bring their own problems such as caste favoritism and high in-group preferences.
The simplest solution would probably be to import Taiwanese engineers en-masse, and formally create new chipset companies (which are not Intel), which it seems only China is really doing.
A direct policy approach could be for the USA to offer anyone with a university degree or trade skill and under the age of 40, from non-oil countries with a HDI of over .85 the ability to permanently migrate to the USA for a nominal fee:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Dev...
And at the same time, deporting all illegal immigrants (to free up housing) and building walls along the southern border - the shortage of cheap labour will encourage automation and innovation.