> The current US law regarding restaurants is in fact that an commercial establishment have very little freedom to refuse to save people based on who they are.

I was referring to non-protected classes of people.

For example, I have the right to refuse to serve someone who has written bad checks at my establishment, for example.

Or I have the right to refuse service to someone who has caused harm to my clients.

Which leads back to my question: Should I be forced to serve these people?