This can work for smaller areas. Tourists get to see the result of preservation because can experience almost the full extent of the territory. However, for a larger area of which most parts are boring, unsafe and hard to reach, it's hard to cover preservation with such funds.
Bolsonaro is unhappy with one such arrangement, covering a much smaller area: visitors pay a $50 fee, collected by the federal government, to enter the archipelago of Fernando de Noronha for a 10 day stay. He wants to the abolish the fee.
Given his general outlook on taxes, I don't see how tourism could fund preservation, except for increasing its scale to a predatory level.
Bolsonaro is unhappy with one such arrangement, covering a much smaller area: visitors pay a $50 fee, collected by the federal government, to enter the archipelago of Fernando de Noronha for a 10 day stay. He wants to the abolish the fee.
Given his general outlook on taxes, I don't see how tourism could fund preservation, except for increasing its scale to a predatory level.
https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2019/07/taxa-de-fern... (in Portuguese)