Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wazzer's commentslogin

say what you want, but iota, out of all of them, actually seems to bring a promising technical solution. @hus_ky on twitter, one of their main devs working on it is a good follow.


have you got any sources for those claims? I’d be interested in learning more!


Productivity:

https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=107229

Human Capital (let's take Pisa scores as a proxy):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programme_for_International_St...

GDP growth, JPN vs US

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/national-gdp-constant-usd...

(Worth pointing out that the US population has grown by ~1/3 whilst Japan has remained about constant, so per capita the effect is not as pronounced)



I'm not sure why the reference, but you probably mean Neuromancer.


Indeed, fixed.


If I understand correctly, with the remaining words from the list. Guess it’s meant as a point of reflection, whether, and in what way, those adjectives might apply.


It's an interesting idea to me, and something I hadn't thought of before. Usually in these kinds of round-robin self-peer rating paradigms the peers are thought of collectively as a kind of oracle, especially as the number of peers increases.

Theoretically I guess there might be some pattern of behavior that goes unnoticed by everyone participating in the exercise. You could imagine, for example, some AI program that analyzes daily recordings of everyone in an organization (admittedly dystopian in its own way but relevant), and identifies some clear pattern in a person that goes unrecognized by everyone in the organization. Whether the AI would "count" in the Johari window exercise is where things get blurry but to the extent the exercise is about human cognition and its consequences I can see how it would apply.


same here, couldn’t live without it.

btw: it’s also possible to go to fullscreen mode, then go directly to the home screen so that the pop-over player is activated, then the video keeps playing while the screen is looked, with controls working from the lockscreen.


When we are 3 years old, we perceive 1 year as a pretty long time, it’s a third of our life after all.

When we get older the same year is becoming a smaller and smaller fraction of our lifetime, thus the time feels to go by much quicker.

At least that was always my personal conclusion.


I like a metaphor that it's about connections, combinations and permutations. As we mature the number of opportunities, changes, permutations lowers. Perhaps those older people who dont experience life going quickly are also able to see opportunities and variablity more?

Possibly also the times when you get stuck in something and think "oh wow this is dragging on" decreases as you age. But it's not the number of times a situation happens (e.g. traffic is getting worse over time) but that reaction to it happens less. Perhaps we get more patient with time and let it pass over quicker.


Veritasium has a video about this subject:

https://youtu.be/aIx2N-viNwY

It turns out that when we're older time passes more quickly even on the scale of minutes.


> when we're older time passes more quickly even on the scale of minutes.

And understatement for anyone who has kids.


I guess those people that you observed being highly materialistic have a false idea about what will bring them happiness. There are people that strive for happiness and choose a different path. Money, I belive, can only get you so far.


The materialism is just a symptom. The root issue is believe happiness is a stasis point where you'll just ride off into the sunset in this fixed emotional state until you die. That belief is why they think they could 'buy' it. They dedicate their lives in search of it.


Money prevents you from being unhappy because of little things like no food, no water, no shelter, poor health, exploitation, exhaustion, social isolation, and so on.

Some people would say that's very far.


The design of that website really caught my eye.


Nice, I always thought I’m pretty good in guessing the production years of movies, photos, and music, so this game is a lot of fun for me.

My first try gave me a score of 4125. I’m curious if I can replicate that result or if I just got lucky!

Edit: Nope… second try: 2728

Edit: 3rd round: 3823


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: