is there not a business opportunity here? to make something as reliable as Gmail, but with better care and attention to Users, that a person could roll their own mail service from it?
Hey, this is a response from My Senator (NY). She is employed on the board of a big law firm that works with Hollywood. I didnt know this until i checked her out after she sent me this. It was copy-N-Pasted in 3 parts (had 3 different fonts) in to the following Email from her (Or her staffer)
Dear ,
Thank you for writing to me regarding S. 968, the PROTECT IP Act of 2011. I understand your concerns.
I am a cosponsor of this legislation because I believe that we must protect American intellectual property against foreign websites that infringe upon our rights. By empowering the Attorney General of the United States to go after foreign infringing websites, this legislation becomes a necessary tool to ensure that U.S. companies remain competitive in the world marketplace. I recognize that there are technical concerns with the enforcement of this bill that need to be addressed. I am committed to working with my colleagues in the United States Senate to ensure that this legislation protects the Constitutional rights of Americans and does not stifle lawful free speech or innovation on the internet.
Thank you again for writing to express your concerns, and I hope that you keep in touch with my office regarding future legislation. For more information on this and other important issues, please visit my website at http://gillibrand.senate.gov and sign up for my e-newsletter.
Contacted a help person @namecheap. when I asked for 50+ domains, was told, there is no bulk discount other than the current SOPASuck type deal. The current SOPASucks is limited to 10 domains.
I Wish there was a bulk discount. Pity namecheap couldn't come up with tiered bulk domain transferring pricing.
But everyone else is using it now so who needs encryption anyway?
Sorry for the snark. I agree with you but trying to raise a raucous about client-side encryption seems to be useless at this point. I only hope they use some of that funding to implement encryption at the very least for those who want and would use it. Even to make it an add-on price is better than no client-side encryption. But then we still have to trust the actions of the binary executable to not do some other nefarious things.
