These are the cases why I understand HR kicks people out immediately during a layoff. But then the employee cries inhumanity and desires that they have access for weeks, when they no longer need to. It’s a risk that’s proven unwise. Blame the layoff, not the access revocation
Can you clarify what you mean?
The example is to show concretely the computation. It works as long as you have the basic setup for shamir secret sharing (and other linear secret sharing schemes actually but I didn't go into that in the article)
I think we're saying the same thing? Just asking about team size won't reveal the answer. So a different set of probing questions might have to be asked.
China government is stonewalling the safety report:
> And then they went silent. International standards require a final report as soon as possible – and, if more than 12 months, annual interim statements. They have not provided updates in over two yeras.
reply