I'm not sure anyone was operating under the idea that a speed test website's code was the hard part.

Everyone here is a genius because their LLM agrees with everything they say.

There does seem to be some with AI psychosis[0] but it's fewer in number than other places and downvoted on posts with moderate amount of comments

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatbot_psychosis

They don’t have a citation because they made it up.

It's been a decade since I was in college but I used to send applications to every vaguely interesting internship, expecting less than 20% of them to contact me.

My university required an internship for graduation so you had to cast a wide net unless you wanted to wait to graduate.

Given how high-profile is and the number of students in the US, 1000 doesn't seem all that impressive.

Sure. Let’s start pushing back against over-incarceration by not punishing people that knowingly did something wrong and flies in the face of the country’s supposed values.

Makes sense.

We should start by removing the ability of prosecutors and police to bring such cases in the first place.

What does that look like here?

They falsely claimed he'd made an actionable threat. We can't remove their power to request warrants and arrest people for legitimately threatening others, right?

They misused power.

The magistrate judge is supposed to be a check on that power. Unfortunately, they've become rubber stamps for the most part. In a functioning system, the judge would block the warrant and arrest.

I think there are ways to have a system where judges do that, without having to criminally prosecute either cops or judges.

> In a functioning system, the judge would block the warrant and arrest.

But they lied to obtain the warrant.

OP says that they left out information (which cops do all the time) but that the warrant shouldn't have been granted either way because of SCOTUS precedent.

Would welcome reform that makes it harder to lie on warrant affidavits, although again, that should be civil in nature.

The affidavit did not support the post was a threat.[1] This was why FIRE said the information left out should not have mattered. Any reasonable competent person would have denied the warrant. But the information left out could have overcome incompetence possibly. This was why FIRE said it was important.

A reasonable system would have required the investigator attached an unedited full screen image which included the post. And the magistrate attempted to view the post if possible to counter deceit. And required the magistrate had legal education.

[1] https://www.fire.org/research-learn/complaint-bushart-v-perr...

I doubt that. The magistrate judge already granted an unconstitutional warrant, why assume the result would be different with more info?

As you are well aware, they kept important facts from the magistrate judge to obtain said warrant.

Swedish death is a specific sound like Entombed, which is fairly different than melo-death bands like In Flames.

I'm not entirely sure why those specific song choices for the Swedish Death category. The older At The Gates albums are more like the original Swedish sound but Slaughter of the Soul (included in Swedish Death) is essentially THE Melo-death album.

What is going to be the event that triggers Wall Street to realize a lot of these companies have been lying about their financials?

Why not? They haven’t left him even as he’s done little but dilute them to stockpile cash.

Have you seen the state of the world? Why would you go through the trouble of being subtle nowadays?

The “powers that be” hate ideology?