Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BLKNSLVR's commentslogin

The internet is just a 'means'; the medium through which an 'end' is reached.

The internet has, to some, become a place. But what these people don't realise is that this place is just the medium, so it's not going to 'do anything' for you passively, you have use it to find an 'ends', rather than just sitting there waiting for the phone to ring or the art to draw itself.

I'm doing the same right now. I should be sleeping but I'm sitting in the medium of HN waiting for distraction to come to me, rather than pursuing my own active goals.

Good night, go and find your 'ends' stop waiting for false ones to come to you.


What is this?

The title made me think it was maybe a sequel to The Cones of Dunshire.


Just reading the first paragraph and I've already started to experience it when attempting to apply AI to Acceptance Criteria that testers have to test against.

The software is necessarily complex due to legislative requirements, and the corpus of documentation the AI has access to just doesn't seem to capture the complexities and subtleties of the system and its related platforms.

I can churn out ACs quicker, but if I just move on to the next thing as if they're 'done' then quality is going to decline sharply. I'm currently entirely re-writing the first set of ACs it generated because the base premise was off.

This is both a prompt engineering and an availability-of-enough-context documentation problem, but both of those have fairly long learning curve work. Not many places do knowledge management very well, and so the requisite base information just may not be complete enough, and one missing 'patch' can very much change a lot of contexts.


I work with Australian tax - lots of regulatory complexity, add the documentation often assumes the reader is a CPA. I've got decent results by telling the chat bot to ask questions instead of making assumptions, and then grilling it to find edge cases.

I did a live demo in front of the CPAs, using their documentation, and Claude asked clarification questions they hadn't thought of and exposed gaps in the old manual processes.


Isn't that part of the point? To compare and contrast the current world 'leadership' with historical figures (which could go both ways).

Got you to comment, job done. Engagement: tick.

You forgot to add:

... that blinds you to any alternative; that indoctrinates distrust in different perspectives; that elevates the humanity of fellow believers above others.


Genuinely not sure if serious.

It's not splitting hairs it's the literal meaning of the words.

It's confusing and clarification is necessary in order to work out how to engage with the comment.


You can tell Sisvel are a bunch of grifters by the fact they use slight grey text on a slightly less grey background.

Aesthetics over function; style over substance. If that's their web design policy it's likely their policy in all other aspects.

I'm also not sure that they're aware that intellectual property rights no longer exist in the US. If AV2 was vibe coded, there would be no case.


> If AV2 was vibe coded, there would be no case.

…for copyright. Not for anything else. Patents would still apply.


At least the war itself is over:

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/01/trump-congress-war-...

Now, about those fuel prices...


There is no war in U-S-Se

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: