Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Aboutplants's commentslogin

It follows the same logic as physical junk mail. We accept the fact that we will receive junk mailers in our physical mailbox and just toss them out.

We shouldn't accept that either. The USPS could stop accepting junk mail, if it were funded properly and didn't have to rely on junk mail for revenue.

The USPS doesn't even have to get involved. Just make it so that recipients can be compensated easily enough with high enough fines and the spam stops immediately.

The USPS literally has a paid service to deliver bulk mail to every address in an area.

And if the law was working correctly that would mean free money for the whole area and a bankrupt sender.

You seem to be suggesting that you're going to successfully fine a postal spam sender for using a paid service offered by the USPS to do the thing that service was designed to do. If the "law was working correctly", that service would stop existing, rather than existing and then incurring fines when used.

There are some limited mechanisms for opting out of targeted mail (e.g. things that have your name on them), and mechanisms for opting out of credit offers in particular. There are not any mechanisms for opting out of "current resident" spam sent to everyone in an area.


There is a big difference between advertising your services and trying to literally steal people's money.

This is an underrated distinction. Sadly, the line is so much more blurred now than even when I was a kid in the 90s.

There are so many businesses now which exist mainly to cheat you, operating at the very edge of what’s technically legal, and relying on their customers not really understanding the full terms of the deals they’re agreeing to. It’s sickening.


Can you post an example? Thank you.

Here are a few that I'm most familiar with.

- Seniors are sold various quackish financial products like annuities which are a terrible deal for them.

- Timeshares, which nearly never work out in the favor of the consumer (and whose value collapses 50-80% instantly if you look at what they go for on the resale market)

- Prepaid card products that cost a bunch of money to load and then incur monthly fees too (exploiting those who have for whatever reason got blacklisted from banking)

- Every financial product that has a 25%+ interest rate, actually, which isn't limited to those with bad credit. Even if you have an 899 credit score, if you walk into Nordstrom and get their credit card, you will have a close to 30% rate on that. This whole business model is obviously built on tricking people into spending money they don't have and carrying a balance.

- Salesmen hawking solar panels that come to my front door and promise me all kinds of savings. Note: Probably only half these are scams! Just have to figure out which half.

- Health insurers, pretty much across the board. They do things like declare the most dominant ambulance service in San Francisco, the SFFD, "out of network", so the SFFD then sends you a bill for $1000 if you had to use an ambulance. The neat lifehack by the insurer is that most people will just curse, cry, maybe go into debt, and pay it. Only like 10-20% of patients will file a complaint with the insurer's state regulator, and those can just be quickly paid. Result: Savings of 80-90% for health insurance company! (If this one sounds oddly specific, you can guess why.)


Every payday loan company, the "we buy houses for cash" companies, rent-to-own companies, title loan companies, the entire buy-now-pay-later ecosystem, the timeshare industry.

Seriously dotancohen, get your people under control.


Who are "my people" that need to be got under control?

Not when half those "advertised services" are in fact scams.

In the Netherlands you put a sticker on your mail box with either of these: - NO ads, NO magazines/papers - NO ads, YES magazines/papers

Some municipalities even make it opt-in so you'd need YES/YES to get mail without a name and address on it. (ie. not direct mail)

There are also laws to enable opting out of direct mail (with name and address).

In effect, junk mail is just gone once you slap a sticker on your mailbox. This is not an unsolvable problem if you just regulate things.


What jurisdiction is responsible for regulating my, Israeli, email "sticker compliance" when using Gmail, American, and the sender is in Romania?

What jurisdiction is responsible for when those Romanians decide to send you anthrax in physical letters?

No idea, I didn't say anything about email.

the analogy breaks at "...to get mail without a name and address on it". spam emails always have RCPT TO.

Who is we? We definitely don't accept that where I live.

Yeah, but junk mail funds the USPS, without it Republicans would've killed the postal service long ago, See the Pension requirement that they pushed in a vain attempt.

StileProject was one I found more interesting, it had a better community and wasn’t completely deranged 100% of the time, but still pushed the boundaries of that type of content.

A true hero in my life. I had VHS copies of Trials Of Life that I wore out through watching over and over as a child. It opened my eyes to the world and wonder of nature. In college I started hunting down every single appearance he had listed in any filmography I could find and have a hard drive in my attic with all but a couple of his earliest Black and White appearances from the earliest part of his career. I haven’t kept up with it with the newest stuff in the past 15 or so years but I definitely need to pull that out and see if I can finalize his catalog.

> A true hero in my life.

Same here. I‘d recommend the 2020 documentary „David Attenborough: A life on our planet“ - if you haven‘t already seen it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Attenborough%3A_A_Life_o...


lol, I’ve seen everything and scramble to VPN or download anything released as soon as it comes out (it’s usually BBC and not available in my region). It brings that childhood nostalgia right back! Luckily my wife thinks it’s cute

From the article:

> Actor Sir Ian McKellen added that Sir David "sums up what was best about the BBC" with "serious programmes made for a popular audience".

A life of serious, informative, gently enlightening work. In itself, an endangered species.


>I definitely need to pull that out and see if I can finalize his catalog

This is what I've been doing over the last few months. Quite a lot is available for free on the Internet Archive, if you look. I just finished the 5-part "Life in the Undergrowth" (2005), about insects and other small critters. Wonderful.


Out of curiosity, what specifically do you think he has done well? And what areas do you disagree with him on?

And how do you balance those?


Yeah nearly all of these are just drones of various sorts

“For AI workloads: The 245TB Micron 6600 ION provided up to 84 times better energy efficiency”

How big of a deal is this part in relation to the initial upfront costs? I’m not privy to the cost of power for SSD


With a modern CPUs hitting 400W it's already a problem to fill a rack top down with servers like you could do before: too many heat to dissipate and transfer, too much power to provide in the first place.

Just imagine something like 2S 9565 in at least 2U machines: with 10 server x 2U x 2 CPU you would have 8kW in the processors alone and you didn't even fill half of the 42U rack.

https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/server/epyc/9005-...


It means you don't have as much to cool.

Getting rid of 30 watts of heat is trivial compared to say, 300 (I don't quite know how to read that ratio since a 2.5kW SSD seems a little high to me).


Given that 2.91TB SSDs are a common enterprise size, perhaps they're saying the 1x245TB SSD uses 1/84 the power of 84 2.91TB SSDs ;p

A big consideration for efficiency and TCO calculations is the number of servers required to house the drives. NVMe drives tend not to be in external JBOF enclosures.

Fewer servers means fewer cpus, less RAM, fewer fans, and maybe fewer switches.


You mean the ones doing the same thing to us as we are to the whales? Just watching and trying to figure us out

What are the likely crops that would replace these? Is there chance for Agrivoltaics or straight up Solar being the most profitable opportunity?

I gotta dig up an old college economics paper I wrote on movie theatre ticket pricing. Movies are priced wrong but that’s complicated by the way the major studios want things run. It’s a whole mess

Let me guess what comes next, Gas State? Where it’s just another larger iteration of the same thing

Deploy packs of Gas Cities with Gas Country! All of that inside our new Gas Planet, where multiple sovereign Gas Countries can cooperate or go to war with each other! All hail our Great Comrade Polecatius of Gasoland, the greatest coding leader of Gas Planet.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: