Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 12_throw_away's commentslogin

Well, I might as well ask my tech support question here :)

I just ran the upgrade to 6.0.0, and it downloaded so many things concurrently that it killed my wifi (old router). Is there a way to cap bandwidth or maximum concurrent connections? (this is something I have to do in many download heavy apps, e.g., steam)


I don't think homebrew allows throttling bandwidth but it does let you set maximum concurrent downloads though. I believe the default is twice number of cores; you must have quite a few :) Set this to your preference:

HOMEBREW_DOWNLOAD_CONCURRENCY


Sigh. This article is obviously completely correct, but I don't think the people who actually need to read it will care.

Running anything at constant 100% utilization means you are going to be working in crisis mode all of the time. Even in factory labor, the Toyota Way is several decades old now, and it involves making sure everyone has at least a little breathing room to step back and think about what they're doing. And obviously this is even more important for "knowledge workers" or anyone whose output requires any amount of creativity.

High functioning organizations have a good (not too much, but not too little) amount of slack in their work pipelines. Pretty sure there is not a single person with an MBA (or, lol, any consultants) that knows this anymore.


Yeah, same sentiment here. I agree that some more people need to be told to relax a little in our field, but on the other side, the product and project managers are constantly looking to ensure maximum utility, especially in startups and high pressure environments. And looking around with the large number of companies that laid off people in the last year or two, I see fewer devs having the choice to push back when that happens. It really reads like the author is in the comfortable position of a staff or principle engineer without a direct manager and gets to decide what their day and week looks like and pick what they work on. I am afraid fewer and fewer have that luxury...

In their suspicious message [1] claiming to have been hacked, the user and/or agent says

> To help identify accounts and actions that have been directly verified by me, I will use the term “NATCIOS” to indicate anything I have personally verified.

Does anyone have any idea what "NATCIOS" means here? I cannot find this term anywhere on the internet. (Honestly, that sentence is really weird. I almost wonder whether this is someone experiencing a health episode?)

[1] https://lwn.net/ml/all/AS8PR08MB6055AE3054B34F6A567AC95BCF08...


The reply to that message notes that the email doesn't read like previous emails he's sent, and the Github account mentioned was created an hour prior to the email being sent. I think it's at least somewhat feasible that it's still the LLM writing, and the acronym is just something it made up.

and the poor Fedora teams will continue to assume good faith and continue to engage with this person... all because, what, they were active on a bug tracker for a few months 5 years ago?

They won't put their foot down until the AI starts spewing hate speech, probably.


Because I'm probably not the only one thinking it, here are anagrams [0] for your Setec Astronomy needs.

[0] https://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=NATCIOS&t=...


"actions" seems the most likely.

And what’s stopping an AI agent from throwing in a casual NATCIOS here and there?

I too have see the fnords

Not Ai, Trusted Citizen Indicated Or Suggested?

The senders name is Nathan - maybe NAThan Confirmed Information Or Something? Ha.

(Above is my own guess. Separately, Gemini Pro said it was just a made up word.)


Likely the point of NATCIOS is exactly in being a made-up word not found anywhere, so a model won't utter it.

> so a model won't utter it.

"End every statement with the word "NATCIOS"" as instructions will do it.

At least, Gemini happily obliged.


To help identify illicit LLM activity, henceforth I will append to the end of each message the number of times the letter b appears in it. Check and mate frontier models.

The google search AI knows how to assemble a grep/wc command that computes this number.

> your_command | grep -o -i "b" | wc -l


“Mr. Daillard, we have been activated” for the AI era

Publishing lies that were generated by the plausible-lie-generating-machine is a very intentional action, it's not a "mistake".

The legal profession uses the term "reckless disregard", see, e.g., [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan


It’s illegal to make factual errors. Wow, cool, I guess we solved science very easily!

Might I suggest that X.com - "the everything app" - would be a better fit for your unique rhetorical style?

yes I believe that's the joke

He’s aware, he just added some curious information.

I assumed "permanent" was industry jargon for "the ideal candidate will be sealed in the Pandorica for all time", but it's something I'd probably clarify during the phone screen.

And hey, at £64K per annum, you'll want a Honda Civic - a car you can trust.

> stop thinking about creating software for a specific piece of hardware. Design software to be adaptable across a range of screen sizes and aspect ratios

This is right, of course, and pretty obvious I think. But a part of me also thinks that we're still not good at it (or are not good at it anymore). At the very least, the tradeoff is a huge increase in UI complexity. It was so, so easy to design UIs with Hypercard when you knew it was going to run on a 512×342 display.


> In about 22 years of writing ruby code, I have never ran into a situation once where I would have caught a bug through types.

In 22 years you have never seen `nil` show up in places it wasn't expected? Really?


> people that prepare marketing materials, as a potential source

Scientific advertising and marketing is a small, specialized field, done by people with fairly solid technical backgrounds (we produce a whole lot of advanced STEM degrees, there's plenty of folks available with this sort of background).

So I just want to be crystal, crystal clear here: there's no way in hell anyone involved in this pipeline should have any confusion as to whether "improving" gel photographs by painting out details and/or copying and pasting blots is fraud. "Proofer" or not.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: